Islamaphobes / Join the World’s Greatest of History /

This is from a blog called The Muslim Issue http://www.themuslimissue.wordpress.com
If you are concerned about Muslims and the Modern World I urge you to check out this blog . Highly informative , well written , and intelligent articles .

Islamophobes
Have you been branded an Islamophobe – a slur word invented by Muslim leaders and clerics against non-Muslims?
Then join the ranks of the world’s greatest political leaders, military leaders, writers, philosophers, historians, researchers and intellectuals; the movers and shakers of history.

gladstone

Quran… an accursed book…. So long as there is this book there will be no peace in the world.

– William Ewart Gladstone
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom four times between 1868 and 1894 (1809–1898).

hirsi-ali_-ayaan-B_W_Size4

Asked whether suicide bombing can be justified as a measure to defend Islam, 26 percent of American Muslims age eighteen to twenty-nine said yes. That is one quarter of the adult American Muslims under the age of thirty, and no matter how you count the number of Muslims in America (estimates vary from 2 million to 8 million), that is a lot of people.

– Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Somali-born American (formerly Dutch) activist, writer, and politician.

teddy

During the thousand years that included the careers of the Frankish soldier and the Polish king, the Christians of Asia and Africa proved unable to wage successful war with the Moslem conquerors; and in consequence Christianity practically vanished from the two continents; and today nobody can find in them any “social values” whatever, in the sense in which we use the words, so far as the sphere of Mohammedan influence. There are such “social values” today in Europe, America, and Australia only because during those thousand years the Christians of Europe possessed the warlike power to do what the Christians of Asia and Africa had failed to do – that is, to beat back the Moslem invader.

– Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt
26th President of the United States

Will-Durant

The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within.

– Will Durant
American writer, historian, and philosopher (November 5, 1885 – November 7, 1981).

hirsi-ali_-ayaan-B_W_Size4

To be blunt, their [Western] efforts to assist Muslims and other minorities are futile because, by postponing or at best prolonging the process of their transition to modernity — by creating the illusion that one can hold on to tribal norms and at the same time become a successful citizen — the proponents of multiculturalism lock subsequent generations born in the West into a no-man’s-land of moral values. What comes packaged in a compassionate language of acceptance is really a cruel form of racism. And it is all the more cruel because it is expressed in sugary words of virtue.

– Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Somali-born American (formerly Dutch) activist, writer, and politician.

ThomasJEfferson5

These future United States presidents questioned the ambassador as to why his (Islamic) government was so hostile to the new American republic even though America had done nothing to provoke any such animosity. Ambassador Adja answered them, as they reported to the Continental Congress, ‘that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise’.

– Thomas Jefferson
U.S. president addressing the Continental Congress about the brutal pirate attacks of the Muslim Ottoman Barbary (1801–1805 and 1815).

winston

How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, lovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

– Sir Winston Churchill, 1899.
British Conservative politician and statesman of the United Kingdom during the Second World War.

hirsi-ali_-ayaan-B_W_Size4

There are many good men and women in the West who try to resettle refugees, scold their fellow citizens for not doing more, donate money to philanthropic organizations, and strive to eliminate discrimination. They lobby governments to exempt minorities from the standards of behavior of Western societies; they fight to help minorities preserve their cultures, and thy excuse their religion from critical scrutiny. These people mean well, I have no doubt. But I believe that their well-intentioned activism is now a part of the very problem they seek to solve.

– Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Somali-born American activist, writer, and politician.

Pakistan and Bangladesh are their fixed deposits. Those are Islamic states. No one else can lay claim on them. India is a joint account. Plunder it as much as you please.

– Shiv Prasad Roy
Indian Bengali writer.

Francois Gautier

This is a profession of faith of a Muslim: ‘I certify that there is no God other than Allah, of whom Mohammed is the only prophet’, which means in effect: After and before Mohammed, there is nobody else…’Thus the whole religion of Islam is based on negation: nobody but us, no other religion but ours’. And if you disagree, you shall die. This puts a serious limitation to tolerance and from this strong belief sprang all the horrors of the Muslim invasion of India.

– Francois Gautier
French writer and journalist based in India.

Ma_Fuxiang_wearing_glasses

If Muslim people do not change their mind in spite of the changes of social conditions, and if we supplement Islamic courtesy and law without explaining and advertising real Islamic beliefs at the same time, then it is impossible to save the minds of the people.

– Ma Fuxiang
Chinese military and political leader spanning the Qing Dynasty.

adams-john-quincy

The command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective… by fraud, or by force.

– John Quincy Adams
American statesman who served as the sixth President of the United States from 1825 to 1829.

ben franklin

Nor can the Plundering of Infidels be in that sacred Book [the Quran] forbidden, since it is well known from it, that God has given the World, and all that it contains, to his faithful Mussulmen, who are to enjoy it of Right as fast as they conquer it.

– Benjamin Franklin
American revolutionary, diplomat, inventor and one of the Founding Fathers of the United States (January 17, 1706 – April 17, 1790).

st-thomas-aquinas

… The point is clear in the case of Muhammad. He seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom.

–St. Thomas Aquinas (Contra Gentiles, Book One, Chapter 6, Paragraph 4)
Italian Dominican friar and Catholic priest and an immensely influential philosopher and theologian in the tradition of scholasticism (1225 – 7 March 1274).

bertrand

Over a billion people believe in Allah without truly knowing what Allah supposedly stands for or what he really demands of them. And the minority that do understand continue to be Moslems because they have redefined their morality and ethics to fit within the teachings of Islam, which are floridly lacking in morality. They therefore redefine what is good and evil in order to fit their lives into what is preached by Islam, instead of examining Islam to see if it fits within the good life. Backwards thinking, imposed by a backward religion.

– Professor Bertrand Russell
British philosopher, logician, mathematician, historian, and social critic (18 May 1872 – 2 February 1970).

Joseph Ernest Renan

Muslims are the first victims of Islam. Many times I have observed in my travels that fanaticism comes from a small number of dangerous men who maintain others in the practice of this religion by terror. To liberate the Muslim from his religion is the best service that one can render him.

– Joseph Ernest Renan
French expert of Middle East ancient languages and civilizations (28 February 1823 – 2 October 1892).

Ram Swarup

Religious harmony is a desirable thing. But it takes two to play the game. Unfortunately such a sentiment holds no position in Islamic theology.

– Ram Swarup
Independent Hindu thinker and prolific author (1920 – 26 December 1998).

adams-john-quincy

In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar, the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle.

– John Quincy Adams
American statesman and the sixth President of the United States from 1825 to 1829. He also served as a diplomat, a Senator and member of the House of Representatives. (July 11, 1767 – February 23, 1848)

winston

Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities – but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.

– Sir Winston Churchill
British Conservative politician and statesman of the United Kingdom (30 November 1874 – 24 January 1965).

rumi

Without demolishing religious schools (madrasas) and minarets (mosques) and without abandoning the beliefs and ideas of the medieval age, restriction in thoughts and pains in conscience will not end. Without understanding that unbelief is a kind of religion, and that conservative religious belief a kind of disbelief, and without showing tolerance to opposite ideas, one cannot succeed. Those who look for the truth will accomplish the mission.

– Mevlana Jalal ad-Din Rumi
Persian Sufi poet and philosopher. Sufi’s have been outlawed and persecuted for seven centuries in the Islamic world (1207 – 17 December 1273).

Dr._Bhim_Rao_Ambedkar

The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt, slavery and enmity.

– Dr.B.R. Ambedkar
Indian jurist, economist, politician and social reformer (14 April 1891 – 6 December 1956).

marre

Do not suppose the statements of the prophets to be true; they are all fabrications. Men lived comfortably till they came and spoiled life. The sacred books are only such a set of idle tales as any age could have and indeed did actually produce. They recite their sacred books, although the fact informs me that these are fiction from first to last. O Reason, thou (alone) speakest the truth. Then perish the fools who forged the religious traditions or interpreted them!

– Al-Ma’arri
11th Century blind Arab philosopher, poet and writer. He labeled religions in general as “noxious weeds” and lay claim that Islam does not have a monopoly on truth.

sri-aurobindo-1

You can live amicably with a religion whose principle is toleration. But how is it possible to live with a religion whose principle is ‘I will not tolerate’? You cannot build unity on such basis. Perhaps the only way of making the Mohammedans harmless is to make them lose their faith in their religion.

– Sri Aurobindo
Born Aurobindo Ghose, was an Indian nationalist, philosopher, yogi, guru, and poet (15 August 1872 – 5 December 1950).

winston

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

– Sir Winston Churchill
British Conservative politician and statesman of the United Kingdom (30 November 1874 – 24 January 1965).

byzantine

Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached. God is not pleased by blood – and not acting reasonably is contrary to God’s nature. Faith is born of the soul, not the body. Whoever would lead someone to faith needs the ability to speak well and to reason properly, without violence and threats… To convince a reasonable soul, one does not need a strong arm, or weapons of any kind, or any other means of threatening a person with death.

– Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos
Conversation between the Emperor and a Persian scholar, 1391.

muir

Some, indeed, dream of an Islam in the future, rationalised and regenerate. All this has been tried already, and has miserably failed. The Koran has so encrusted the religion in a hard unyielding casement of ordinances and social laws, that if the shell be broken the life is gone. A rationalistic Islam would be Islam no longer.

– Sir William Muir
Scottish Orientalist, scholar of Islam, and colonial administrator (27 April 1819 – 11 July 1905).

Francois Gautier

Let it be said right away: the massacres perpetrated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese in early days of America.

– Francois Gautier
French writer and journalist based in India.

Will-Durant

The Mohammedan conquest of India was probably the bloodiest story in history.

– Will Durant
American writer, historian, and philosopher (November 5, 1885 – November 7, 1981).

irfanhusain

The Muslim heroes who figure larger than life in our history books committed many dreadful crimes. Mahmud of Ghazni, Qutb-ud-Din Aibak, Balban, Mohammed bin Qasim, and Sultan Mohammad Tughlak, all have blood-stained hands that the passage of years has not cleansed. Indeed, the presence of Muslim historians on their various campaigns has ensured that the memory of their deeds will live long after they were buried…..Seen through Hindu eyes, the Muslim invasion of their homeland was an unmitigated disaster.

– Irfan Husain
Pakistani columnist and writer for Dawn.

Dr Younis Shaikh

….eighty million were slaughtered and millions of women were raped…..it was standard practice for Islamic warlords like Ghori and Ghazni to unleash the mass rape and enslavement of hundreds of thousands of women after the slaughter of all males.
An extremely large percentage of Muslims in South Asia today are the progeny of forcible conversions and systematic rape campaigns by marauding Muslim invaders.

– Dr. Younis Shaikh
Pakistani medical doctor, human rights activist and freethinker.

Koenraad Elst

..the number of victims of the persecutions of Hindus by Muslims is easily of the same order of magnitude as that of the Nazi extermination policy, though no one has yet made the effort of tabulating the reported massacres and proposing a reasonable estimate of how many millions exactly must have died in the course of the Islamic campaign against Hinduism (such research is taboo). On top of these there is a similar number of abductions and deportations to harems and slave-markets, as well as centuries of political oppression and cultural destruction……

– Koenraad Elst
Belgian orientalist and Indologist.

Muslims will only live as an oppressive majority and a turbulent minority.

– Dr K D Prithipal
Professor of Comparative Religion, University of Alberta.

A nationalist Muslim is only a contradiction in terms.

– Sardar Ballavbhai Patel
Indian barrister and statesman, leader of the Indian National Congress and one of founding fathers of the Republic of India (31 October 1875 – 15 December 1950).

Alain Danielou

From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions.

– Alain Danielou
French historian, intellectual, musicologist, Indologist (4 October 1907 – 27 January 1994).

Annie Besante

The inner Muslim feeling of hatred against ‘unbelievers’ has spring up naked and unashamed…. We have seen, revived, as guide in practical politics, the old Muslim religion of the sword…. In thinking of an independent India, the menace of Mohammedan rule has to be considered.

– Annie Besant
British socialist, theosophist, women’s rights activist, writer and orator. Party member of the Indian National Congress (1 October 1847 – 20 September 1933).

lewis2

The penalty for apostasy in Islamic law is death. Islam is conceived as a polity, not just as a religious community. It follows therefore that apostasy is treason. It is a withdrawal, a denial of allegiance as well as of religious belief and loyalty. Any sustained and principled opposition to the existing regime or order almost inevitably involves such a withdrawal.

– Bernard Lewis
British-American historian, scholar in Oriental studies, and political commentator.

muir

The contrast between our own faith and Islam is most remarkable. There are in our Scriptures living germs of truth, which accord with civil and religious liberty, and will expand with advancing civilisation. In Islam it is just the reverse. The Koran has no such teaching as with us has abolished polygamy, slavery, and arbitrary divorce, and has elevated woman to her proper place. As a Reformer, Mahomet did advance his people to a certain point, but as a Prophet he left them fixed immovably at that point for all time to come.

– Sir William Muir
Scottish Orientalist, scholar of Islam, and colonial administrator (27 April 1819 – 11 July 1905).

adams-john-quincy

He (Muhammad) poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. The essence of his doctrine was violence and lust: to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature.

– John Quincy Adams
American statesman and the sixth President of the United States from 1825 to 1829. He also served as a diplomat, a Senator and member of the House of Representatives. (July 11, 1767 – February 23, 1848).

st-thomas-aquinas

Nor do divine pronouncements on the part of preceding prophets offer him [Muhammad] any witness. On the contrary, he perverts almost all the testimonies of the Old and New Testaments by making them into fabrications of his own, as can be. seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity. It is thus clear that those who place any faith in his words believe foolishly.

–St. Thomas Aquinas (Contra Gentiles, Book One, Chapter 6, Paragraph 4)
Italian Dominican friar and Catholic priest and an immensely influential philosopher and theologian in the tradition of scholasticism (1225 – 7 March 1274).

Lala Lajpat Rai

I have devoted most of my time during the last six months to the study of Muslim History and Muslim Law and I am inclined to think that Hindu-Muslim unity is neither possible nor practicable… I do honestly and sincerely believe in the necessity and desirability of Hindi-Muslim unity. I am also fully prepared to trust the Muslim leaders, but what about the injunctions of the Koran and Hadis. The leaders cannot override them.

– Lala Lajpat Rai
Indian Punjabi author and politician who is chiefly remembered as a leader in the Indian fight for independence (28 January 1865 – 17 November 1928).

SARAT Chandra Chattopadhyay

If we go by the lessons of history we have to accept that the goal of the Hindu-Muslim unity is a mirage. When Muslims first entered India, they looted the country, destroyed the temples, broke the idols, raped the women and heaped innumerable indignities on the people of this country. Today it appears that such noxious behavior has entered the bone marrow of Muslims. Unity can be achieved among equals…. I am of the view that Hindu-Muslim unity, which could not be achieved during the last thousand years, will not materialize during the ensuing thousand years.

– Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay
Bengali novelist and short story writer (15 September 1876 – 16 January 1938).

muir

The tree (of Islam) is of artificial planting. Instead of containing within itself the germ of growth and adaptation to the various requirements of time and clime and circumstance, expanding with the genial sunshine and rain from heaven, it remains the same forced and stunted thing as when first planted some twelve centuries ago.

– Sir William Muir
Scottish Orientalist, scholar of Islam, and colonial administrator (27 April 1819 – 11 July 1905).

st-thomas-aquinas

Indeed, the truths that he [prophet Muhammad] taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity. He did not bring forth any signs produced in a supernatural way, which alone fittingly gives witness to divine inspiration; for a visible action that can be only divine reveals an invisibly inspired teacher of truth. On the contrary, Muhammad said that he was sent in the power of his arms—which are signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants. What is more, no wise men, men trained in things divine and human, believed in him from the beginning. Those who believed in him were brutal men and desert wanderers, utterly ignorant of all divine teaching, through whose numbers Muhammad forced others to become his followers by the violence of his arms.

–St. Thomas Aquinas (Contra Gentiles, Book One, Chapter 6, Paragraph 4)
Italian Dominican friar and Catholic priest and an immensely influential philosopher and theologian in the tradition of scholasticism (1225 – 7 March 1274).

rabindranath-tagore

A very important factor which is making it almost impossible for Hindu-Muslim unity to become an accomplished fact is that the Muslims cannot confine their patriotism to any one country. I had frankly asked many Muslims whether, in the event of any Mohammedan power invading India, they would stand side by side with their Hindu neighbours to defend their common motherland, I was not satisfied with the reply I got from them.

– Rabindranath Tagore
Bengali polymath and Nobel Prize winner in Literature who reshaped Bengali literature and music, as well as Indian art (7 May 1861 – 7 August 1941).

———————————————————————————-

361 thoughts on “Islamophobes”

islammeanspeace says:
May 23, 2015 at 9:08 am

THIS SITE IS DISINFORMATION ABOUT ISLAM RUN BY ISLAM HATERS AND ANTI-ISLAM SCUMS

Admin says:
May 23, 2015 at 11:18 am

News is hateful to you? Here’s a suggestion: stop being a walking, talking representative of hate and news wont be able to write anything offensive for you.

lukefossil says:
June 2, 2015 at 4:38 pm

Islammeanspeace is just another lie by a lying Muslim . This is probably the best article I have ever seen to illustrate the plague of Islam . Every infidel needs to read this . Actual historical quotes and you call it disinformation . I hate Islam , just like I hate Scientology , Jim Jones , Charles Manson , and every cult posing as some kind of religion . Islam appeals to the most ignorant human beings who ever walked this earth . Satan lives and he is Allah /hammed .

haskusay says:
May 16, 2015 at 6:26 am

Tondolayo Lipschitz says:
May 10, 2015 at 9:19 pm

hansvandemortel says:
May 1, 2015 at 6:23 am

“Mohammed wrote the quran and ‘allah’ was his username.”

Mohammed is well known as an historical Arab desert terrorist war criminal fascist.

Nobody in the world is worshipping Hitler anymore. Muslims all over the world still do with Mohammed. There is something wrong in the brain.of muslims. People who enjoy a fascist religion do not belong in a democratic country. That’s right as we see. The muslim world is ruled by dirty fascist regimes. I’m an atheist and I know there is allways Jesus, the peaceful man, ment in the Koran. No way, muslims are stupid not loved people in our democracy and have no interst in peaceful Jesus. These dummies prefer to name their sons Mohammed instead of Jesus (Isa). The prisons are overcrowded with Mohammeds nowadays and no Jesus.

Muslims prefer living in the western and stay muslim, because they are parasites. Just like there fascist religion is teaching them.

Raphly Alo says:
May 23, 2015 at 5:35 pm

ok, read the quran and the hadiths?

jeffcorbin says:
April 27, 2015 at 9:24 pm

@OSIA R.. Any faith, belief, religion or custom which can even be remotely used / interpreted to justify the crimes against humanity needs to be dumped….
Pingback: Pope Francis Commemorates 100th Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide- “the first of the 20th Century” – Dr. Rich Swier
branchbud says:

The difference between a moderate Muslim and a radical is huge. The radical wants to cut your head off and the moderate Muslim wants the radical to cut your head off.

hansvandemortel says:
April 24, 2015 at 7:10 am

If you are believing and loving what Hitler wrote in ‘Mein Kampf’, you are like a nazi, an unwanted fascist. Exactly is what happening with all muslims. They believe without doubt in the dirty sadistic lines which everybody can read in the Koran. Muslims are at heart fascists. And it does not make any difference when they don’t understand the word ‘fascist’.

hans van de mortel says:
March 30, 2015 at 8:06 am

Muslims ara all parasites. They can’t allow themselves not to accept our western civilication, the modern democratic society without Allah (the servant of Muhammed). But muslims, in the meantime, deny it and do hate it. Once a muslim, allways a muslim, or you are dead! That’s why we understand and have the knowledge that the historical Muhammed was just no more than a primitive sadistic Arabic war terrorist. Being an atheist, I prefer Jezus, who was a man of peace without blood on his hands.

Johnd says:
March 30, 2015 at 6:45 am

I have read the Koran, twice, and think it is the most evil book in existence. For that reason alone it should be read by everyone. You have certainly misunderstood it. I recommend you read a commentary by an expert. May I suggest ‘ The complete infidels guide to the Koran’ by Robert Spencer. Its guaranteed to change your life.

foiensavon says:
March 30, 2015 at 2:47 pm

I have read several books of the kind, which , sorry for you, have strengthened my beliefs. If my life is going to change, that’s because of the changes that I decide to make for the better, to increase my potential as a human being and part of a society in which I want to play the role of a good citizen. But apparently you’re convinced that in my free time I plan explosions, future world wars and collect bombs and guns. What a sad life you must have. let me know for some moral support. By the way, If you’re that into this Islam hatred , why don’t you sign in the Amnesty international site for the freedom of Raif Albadawi, a blogger which KSA has condemned to 1000 whips because he “offended islam” ? God bless you. http://write.amnestyusa.org/case/raif/

Peace Tolerance says:
February 11, 2015 at 8:10 pm

Islamophobia: An irrational fear of being decapitated

Oolon Colluphid says:
February 12, 2015 at 12:11 am

Or perhaps “A rational fear of being decapitated by the irrational”.

hansvandemortel says:
January 17, 2015 at 12:54 pm

Muslims are sick people. They adore a war criminal like the ultimate Arab dessert sadist Muhammed. I’m an atheist, but what’s wrong with Jesus? He was no murderer like Muhammed, he was no sexist like the selfmade prophet, I don’t believe nothing, I try to understand and to know. So I’m not interested in Jesus. In Actually he was a fool, but no bestial human being like Muhammed. Islam and the Roman Catholicism are the same devil orientated religions considering the teaching of sadism. It’s not the old jewish teaching, neither the original chrstian teaching. To torture human beings for ever in a hell fire has developed in the sick mind of psychopaths like the popes in Rome, and in the illiterate mind of Muhammed who copied these dirty sick satanic ideas from this early dirty christian religion.

What’s up? What counts nowadays since a long time ago? The truth is that nobody is killing by shouting Allah akbar! Only muslims do. Watch Tv and listen to the radio. Every day worse and worse. Muslims are sick people, I told you. You know why? Because they don’t have their own believe in a God, but the exclusieve believe of the illiterate man, sadist and war criminal Arabic terrorist Muhammed.

You can’t argue with someone who trusts his soul to a 1400 year old Arabic fool and psychopath named Muhammed.

foiensavon says:
March 29, 2015 at 7:13 pm

Believing in what TV and Radio broadcast everyday is not that far from believing in the existence of Santa Claus.
Please, search more deeply, don’t just float on the surface of lazy ignorance. I mean, inform yourself, don’t just absorb whatever you’re told! The same for who leads this blog. You’re all intolerant in the first place, and yet you accuse intolerance. Think this over.

Pigasus (the winged swine) says:

This site is run by people exceedingly familiar with Islam. That is the whole point.

foiensavon says:
March 30, 2015 at 5:00 am

If you think you are getting informed about Islam through this website, you’re wrong. And if you really want to get informed and not have a distorted version of how things work, so please, consult the holy Quran and the prophetic Tradition. Wonder why every time I suggest this to people who believe in everything they’re told about similarities between Islam and terrorism they refuse. Perhaps I know why. You’re pretty much comfortable in the mud of ignorance, that’s why. But if I wanted to know better a topic that I know nothing about except for the few selected lies of the news, I would never refuse consulting authentic sources. This website was made to throw mud on Islam, it must lie about it so as to confirm its general rule of hatred. You’re walking corpses deprived of the wonder of curiosity.

Pigasus (the winged swine) says:
March 30, 2015 at 7:36 am

…in the mud of ignorance…

Curious that you should describe an atheist as living in the mud of ignorance when you wear it like a suit. You religionists live with one foot in the Bronze Age. We don’t burn libraries, smash museums, slit throats, poison wells, rape children or hold our species back.

You do.

Like
foiensavon says:
March 30, 2015 at 2:28 pm

1

3

Rate This

I guarantee you dear Pigasus that I would never ever burn a library since they are my natural habitat, just like museums that I attend like my house, and it is simply absurd accusing me of slitting throats, raping children and poisoning Wells since these things are against my morals and ethics, firstly because part of them are to be attributed to chistians, religion to which I don’t belong, secondly the Wells issue was a murmur spread again Jews in the middle age so as to scare people to death against them. Your basic problem is that you are against people that you don’t even know. And atheism doesn’t necessarily mean reason, because I assure you I am reasonable as you do with the plus point of faith. And the two things are compatible , perhaps you can’t figure out why, but that’s okay. After all we only use 11% of our brain potential, don’t we.

Like
Pigasus (the winged swine) says:
March 30, 2015 at 6:06 pm

4

1

Rate This

You are being disingenuous. In the collective, your ideology is reported doing these things on a nonstop basis. I’ve encountered the statement that on only six days since September 11, 2001, have there been no reports of the followers of Muhammed murdering unbelievers because of their unbelief. I cannot testify that this is so, because I have found not one day absent of said report.

Faith is not a virtue. Believing and thinking exclude each other. I engage in the latter.

Congratulations on not burning down your library. Your restraint is admirable.

Like
foiensavon says:
March 31, 2015 at 2:48 pm

1

2

Rate This

Are you joking? Who do you think gave birth to Algebra? Who do you think introduced Algorithms? Who do you think translated most part of the philosophical and physics essays from ancient Greek to Arabic and therefore provided for most of the knowledge sources that the western world could ever dream of , where do you think part of the astronomic lexis comes from? the holy Quran was the driving force that lead to curiosity and research in all scientific fields, and allowed those people, that is Arabs, to contribute to the most reasonable science of them all, Mathematics. Before jotting down nonsense like thought and belief have nothing to do with each other, reflect that the latter could lead to the former. I don’t say that it necessarily leads to the former, but it might do, as it has in these examples. The world is not either one way or The other. It is in shades that lies the truth, or at least the possibility. I’m not a terrorist if I’m muslim. I don’t repell books just because the worst book you’ve ever read is one of my favourite. And please, avoid the nine eleven thing because , no matter what you believe, it doesn’t have anything to do with Islam. Nothing.
And please, avoid the library thing, I’m sure you must be at least twice my age, and yet your replies aren’t that mature, aren’t they.

Like
Admin says:
March 31, 2015 at 3:19 pm

10

1

Rate This

Islam is the youngest religion on earth and has contributed nothing but mass murders. On the contrary, Muslims destroyed civilizations and deprived them of their history and accomplishments, forcing them to start all over again from scratch while the Muslim invaders looted and exploited all their discoveries and inventions to expand their caliphate.

1. Who gave birth to Algebra?
The start of algebra as an area of mathematics is dated to the end of 16th century, with François Viète’s work. The roots of algebra can be traced to the ancient Babylonians, who developed an advanced arithmetical system with which they were able to do calculations in an algorithmic fashion.
The word algebra comes from the Arabic language (الجبر al-jabr “restoration”). Restoration refer to restoring knowledge that Muslims looted and destroyed.

2. Who introduced Algorithms?
The ancient Babylonians.

3. The Quran itself is aquired from 100% loot from 365 tribes that were the original inhabitants of Arabia, before Mohammeds killing and extinction of these peoples. The earliest Quran is not contained in one language, but in multiple dialects, proving that the story of “angel Gabriel” giving knowledge to Mohammed was total nonsense. That’s why the Quran contains segments from other religions that existed thousands of years before Mohammed was even conceived.

Arabs have contributed ZERO to humanity. They contributed nothing but destruction then – and they contribute nothing but conflicts and destruction now. Muslims should abandon the satanic cult of Islam and return to the roots from which they came, before they were forced to convert to this ultimate evil.

Liked by 2 people
Oolon Colluphid says:
March 31, 2015 at 10:41 pm

3

1

Rate This

“Believing in what TV and Radio broadcast everyday … Please, search more deeply, don’t just float on the surface of lazy ignorance.”

You’re making your own set of narrow assumptions here to suggest those who use this site only understand Islam through the media. Don’t kid yourself; reading the book and listening to what muslims say about it is actually what convinces people the religion itself is the problem. Muslims are the ones who confine themselves to one narrow source of information of exceptionally dubious provenance, throwing a hissy fit if anyone challenges their view, and incapable of taking in any other viewpoint. So who really is ‘bathing in the mud of ignorance’ here then?

Perhaps its more comfortable to assure yourself that critics of your religion are the narrow minded ones, but like most vanities, asserting something doesn’t turn it into fact.

Like
sentimentalswordsman says:
April 24, 2015 at 4:21 am

1

1

Rate This

you’re not burning libraries cause Islam has no library! Muslims can claim they had high civilization. But then what so called Islam Civilization are all stolen from the lands they conquered. Algebra is taken from India. Islamic architecture? That’s all Persian and other Middle Eastern architecture. Look at India, Egypt, what did Muslims do to them? Who were the scholars of Egypt, weren’t they the Coptics? What have muslim do in Xinjiang, Southern Thailand, Southern Philippines?

This site run by people who is familiar with Islam, and the person just want others to know the true color or Islam.

If you are a moderate muslim, then it is good for you. But perhaps you’re moderate because you haven’t read the Koran all over again.

Like
Dal says:
January 13, 2015 at 2:51 pm

13

4

Rate This

Islam is a false dogma.

Liked by 1 person
Reply
Jackbo Godfrey says:
January 11, 2015 at 7:34 am

13

4

Rate This

Excellent Web site. Really good. Love the quotes of western leaders thru the ages. Very well done.

Like
Reply
Osia R says:
January 10, 2015 at 3:20 am

4

19

Rate This

Oh! HEATHEN,

Honestly reading your post made me LOL. You’re going to tell me what Khomeini said as broadcasted on BBC, print media, and umm IRCC (some radio station which google is yet to hear of) and then you proudly quote from an Islamophobic website without any references. Nice way to make a point!
Last I checked, if anyone was to put whatever statement into “quotations”, and reference it to so and so’s name, doesn’t suddenly qualify as a legitimate quote, buddy!

Because of your completely erroneous quote, every single thing u say looses credibility in my eyes.
Just to give you an analogous example, what you just quoted is like, me telling everyone, all confidently, I heard from XYZ people that your mother revaled to everyone:
“I have never showered in my life!”
-HEATHEN’S MAMA
Then i come and tell you, omg i heard from so and so (some non genuine source), your mother is mad dirty, she’s never showered. You’d be like, Umm OK! what the hell, lol, roll your eyes, and walk the hell away. I’m guessing? I mean would you even want to counter such a dumb statement?
I’m sorry, but like that’s how pathetic your quote is. lol

But anyhow, I’ll suck it up.

Here’s a verse from a book which KHOMEINI and every other Muslim person out there is called to live by: Therefore, one of the rules of studying prophetic traditions is, in order to see whether a tradition/narration is legid. #1 condition must be: It does not go against the teachings of the Quran.
That’s a way to distinguish a fabricated tradition stated by Mohammad, or regarding Mohammad. Therefore i repeat again, Bukhari is filled with fabricated ones.

And you’re saying Khomeini in 1989 gave this verdict…so if that was really the case, it must have been recorded SOMEWHERE IN THE BOOKS OF HIS, or even a similar statement should be found somewhere along those lines. HOWEVER, it seems to be NOWHERE. I’m more than familiar with all his works..
No idea whatsoever where you guys pop out with these weird quotes. It’s bewildering. Almost fascinating. lol
Somewhere, someone’s out there, or a group of losers are, just making shit up. lol
And idiots are swallowing every morsel that they shove down their throats.
It proves to what extent people will go above and beyond, and wayyyy out of their way, just to shy people away from the truth/ reality.
And i’m not only speaking in terms of public figures, i mean the bare truth.

BBC, print media, FOX, CNN, blah blah…come on, this is the 21st century. You don’t actually gobble up every single thing reported in the media, do you?! You don’t need to be “MOSLEM” to know how biased the media is, lol.

Conspirators everywhere. Try attaining real info from non-biased sources to open your very narrowed minds.

Peace.

Like
Reply
Osia R says:
January 10, 2015 at 3:53 am

2

12

Rate This

Sorry, forgot to post the verse in regards to marriagable age in Islam. This is to leave you in “astonishment”, Heathen.
Apparently Khomeini didn’t make a verdict in terms with the Quran…oh my!
Or maybe because Khomeini never did make such an unfathomable verdict, but that could never be the case since it was broadcasted on BBC, lol.

“And test the orphans [as regards to their intelligence] till they REACH MARRIAGABLE AGE. Then if you perceive in them sound judgement, release their property to them. And do not consume it wastefully, and hastily fearing that they should grow up, and whoever amongst guardians is rich, he should take no wages, but if he is poor, let him have for himself what is just and reasonable (according to his work). And when you release their property to them, take witness in their presence; and Allah is All-Sufficient in taking account.” verse 4:6

So that completely rules out any BABIES or KIDS for that matter, since you need to have intellect and sound judgement to be of marriagable age according to the book. And in the narrations it is stated clearly, that does not occur till the child AT LEAST hits puberty.

The conspiracy is so transparent in your statement. A man stands up to the West, so lets term him a pedophile?

Like
Reply
pam indo says:
January 12, 2015 at 6:27 pm

8

3

Rate This

Gee, you love to talk about Ayotallah Khomenmi. I read a great article about 4 months ago on the online news magazine called, “The DC Clothesline” It says that it is to launder America’s dirty linens. In this one article, “Does Moo mean “No”/’ , instead of laundering America’s dirty laundry, the article laundered some of you muslims dirty laundry–especially Khomenie’s. It seems that this Afghanistan online news magazine (which I subscribe to) announced that some Taliban fighters had been caught having sex with a cow. The near by villagers disarmed the Creeps and beat them up. In the article, it talked about the fact that Khomeinie published a book in 1990 in which he announced that it was all right for muslim men to have sex with animals as long as the animal is slaughtered as soon as the man has his orgasm, but the meat is to be sold in the neighboring town, not in the town, village where the animal/ rapist resides!!!! The article also had this research study done whereby all these muslim countries were followed by how many searches the guys in these countries were doing in oneline searches for sex with animals. It was this Pakistani newspaper staff that did the search. I see that this same story is appearing (about the Pakistani newspaper search) on my community blog, anti-Islamic “Kafir and Proud’ (Private) this same story out of a Pakistani TV media report. Also, over this community, (I belong to about 5 of these anti-Islamic communitites0, I saw where a US drone flying over Pakistan, picked up a night vision silhouette type video of several people (from what was shown, it is pretty obvious that they were men) out in a field or enclosure having sex with what appear to be goats or sheep or some facsimile/ I end my quote with the title of the article in ‘DC Clothesline: “Does ‘Moo’ mean ‘No’ ?”

Like
Oolon Colluphid says:
February 12, 2015 at 12:15 am

2

1

Rate This

@pam indo

Thanks for that! Just tried the stats of google searches for sex with animals by country – yes, hysterical results!

Like
Heathen says:
January 10, 2015 at 4:18 am

6

0

Rate This

“….IIRC, Iranian english language radio….”

Translated into idiot, so you might stand a chance of understanding, that would be ‘if I recall correctly’, a common internet abbreviation. 1989, as I stated. The radio station was the Voice of the Islamic Republic of Iran – the Iranian state broadcasters international shortwave service in English. Not exactly known for putting bullshit into the supreme leaders mouth; he did that well enough on his own. Sorry, I don’t have a recording. As to the media, apparently you do have to be a muslim to believe its always biased against you, all of the time.

What’s next if the asinine attempts at kindergarten ridicule don’t shut everyone up? Go and shoot up the kuffar at the local coffee shop?

I quote from a site of dubious provenance, you quote from 1400 year old fairy tales written by a man who advocated sex with children and decreed murder for contradicting his opinion – who’s the more narrow minded idiot here?

Any peace in this world certainly won’t come off the back of your dysfunctional beliefs.

Like
Reply
OSIA R says:
January 10, 2015 at 5:38 pm

4

8

Rate This

Heathen,

You sound a bit offended. I wonder why.

I did not quote from a “1400 yr old fairy tale book” telling you this is an authentic book for YOU. Instead I had said it is the authentic book for Khomeini and for every other Muslim out there, since you decided to post a completely erroneous quote by him; which was preceded by your statement, “and I’d be astonished if he’d just made the judgement up on a whim, without precedent:”
Thereby, I quoted the verse to prove that it was undeniably fabricated based on the indisputable book, which HE believed in.

If you believe the media is a non-biased, truth revealing source, then OK! Let me not be the one to pop your bubble…
You choose to live in ignorance; so be it.

Just because a so called, “muslim nut job”, goes to a local cafe, hijacks it and shoots random people, does not in any way mean Islam made him do it.

“Each individual is your brother in faith, or your brother in HUMANITY” Ali ibn-abi Talib

The man you say, “who advocated sex with children, and killed off anyone who contraindicated his opinion”….that’s exactly where all this stems from. THIS very ideology is one of the ROOT causes for ISIS and every other terrorist organization out there. Unfortunately, it’s ignorant ones like you who are promoting it.

Because no way in ISLAM, OR MOHAMMAD’s LIFE, did he allow that sort of ideology, or promote it. He lived by the exact opposite code. And people like you, who have no issues with living in a bubble, believing lies and promoting falsehood, are the ones that are spreading it around, almost justifying that the “RELIGION of ISLAM/MOHAMMAD” ALLOWS these terrorist attacks and killings, so they can feel more pride and continue doing it. Way to go.

And proof lies in the fact that you keep calling my beliefs dysfunctional. Me being a person who opposes killings, who denounces any one forcing religion on another, anyone causing fear and oppression. I have contionusly been saying, that’s not my religion. That is not Islam. And if you believe what i’m saying to be dysfunctional, well i can’t say much to that, now can i?

“There shall be no compulsion [in acceptance] of the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in and rejects the false dieties and believes in Allah, has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing.” 2:256

Not myself, nor anyone else, has anything to loose by you continuing to hate Islam and Mohammad…etc.
Ignorance is ones own loss.

Like
Eric Taylor says:
March 24, 2015 at 12:49 am

0

0

Rate This

anjem says world is flat all canadian soldiers know earth is round so we can shoot muslems more effectively. dog killers ra[pists murderers pediphiles kidnapers drug dealers why we worry about collateral damage with persons who deserve death?

Like
lukefossil says:
June 2, 2015 at 4:59 pm

0

0

Rate This

Osia R . The quotes are from some of the greatest minds of their times . If any one might have a grasp of the threat of Islam it is these people . Should I discount the quotes or go with your feeble whining . The point is never whether you , yourself are a sane Muslim, which is what the rest of us hear all the time , but the undeniable fact that wherever there are Muslims , there is friction with the rest of the populations who are not Muslims . Until you can explain why that is you remain a raping , child , boy , girl , goat / sheep , incest , sex ,crazed , barbaric , looting , terrorist .

Like
Reply
Shaun Bowdrey says:
January 9, 2015 at 4:31 am

10

3

Rate This

Osia R – would you please explain to me why moslems think it was OK for mohammed to rape 9 year olds? He married his favourite “wife” when he was 50 and she was 6. Although he didn’t “consummate the marriage” (or child rape as it’s correctly known) till she was an elderly 9 years old.
This is the moslem prophet. The man that angels speak to. Yes, I can see why he appealed to the arabs so early on; he was a murderer, a paedophile and liked to commit unnatural acts with livestock. The perfect arab role model!

Liked by 1 person
Reply
Shaun Bowdrey says:
January 9, 2015 at 4:21 am

7

3

Rate This

The problem with islam is this: There are, among it’s ranks, a very large proportion of followers who are evil, inhuman, thirsty for blood and are willing to kill millions in the name of allah & the false prophet, the paedophile mohammed. This is because it is exactly what mohammed wanted his cult members to do. He was one of, if not THE, most evil men ever to walk this planet. These followers are guided, encouraged, financed & trained by the wealthy in the cult and by the ‘clergy’, who preach hatred, intolerance and murder, saying the murderers will be rewarded in heaven for committing the atrocities. After that you have the bulk of the cult, who claim to be “tolerant” towards non-moslems, “moderate” in their beliefs and “opposed to the bloodshed & violence “. Only problem is, the last group doesn’t actually exist. There is no such thing as a “tolerant” or “moderate” moslem. Every moslem is a threat to every non-moslem. They would all murder non-moslems without hesitation or remorse. That is what it is to be a moslem.
The solution for islam is this: Islam is a cancer, a deadly virus that wants to wipe out humanity. WIPE IT OUT FIRST.

Like
Reply
Osia R says:
January 9, 2015 at 4:55 pm

4

5

Rate This

“The moment you start arguing with an ignorant fool you have already lost” Ali ibn-Abi Talib

Lol, yes please come and tell me what my belief system is. Please come and tell me who Mohammad is. Because from what i understand, you speak of a completely new religion here which i was never introduced to. Apparently the real Islam, huh? Oh he married a child at the age of 6, lol. You know you can come and regurgitate all the false “facts” you read over the internet, but no one can deny age that has been recorded in history, don’t come and speak of narrations that i have outright already told you were false fabrications, because they were, check up on it yourself, but not from the POV of the muslims that share FUNDAMENTAL beliefs same as ISIS and such groups etc. Go and google up the authenticity of Bukhari according to the Ahlulbayt (the family of the Mohammad).

http://www.askthesheikh.com/what-is-the-shia-view-on-sunni-hadith-books-such-as-sahih-bukhari-and-sahih-muslim/

Peace be upon you, brother!

Like
Reply
Heathen says:
January 9, 2015 at 9:29 pm

4

4

Rate This

OK, probably not your branch of Islam, but Ayatollah Khomeini did approve ‘thighing’ or sodomy of young children in an official judgement in 1989 – pre web, but I recollect it being reported at the time in the print media, BBC radio and IIRC, Iranian english language radio. The translation I found quickly is not from an islam friendly site, but certainly echoes what I recall from the time, and I’d be astonished if he’d just made the judgement up on a whim, without precedent:

“A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate vaginally, but sodomising the child is acceptable. If a man does penetrate and damage the child then, he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl will not count as one of his four permanent wives and the man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister… It is better for a girl to marry at such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband’s house, rather than her father’s home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven.”

Like
Moroni Breitbart says:
January 13, 2015 at 4:07 pm

5

3

Rate This

Founder off ISIS…Satan. Founder of Islam…Satan. Founder of secret combinations commonly referred to as Liberals…Satan.

Like
mitya says:
January 7, 2015 at 4:23 pm

11

0

Rate This

While I do appreciate OSIA R’s spirited defense of his/her faith, I cannot but marvel at the human capacity to rationalize and air-brush unpleasant aspects of ones belief system. To present the past and current Islamic behavior as a clever and practical misuse of their prophet’s ‘revelations’ by “atrociously fierce conquerors” (who “INVENTED their own philosophies to JUSTIFY KILLING people and conquering their lands”) is (in my view) a lame attempt to mislead the uninitiated and deflect blame away from the original source itself – namely Muhammad and his Koran.

Surely OSIA R has read the Koran. Could he/she deny that her “fierce conquerors” acted exactly as directed by Muhammad? Even a lay reader of the original sources of Islam (like myself) can cite exact quotes (from the Koran) that sanctions murder and mayhem of ‘non-believers’, enslavement of their women and children, and even killing the ‘believers’ who doubt or even question their faith. These exhortations speak for themselves and need no interpretation – unless, of course, OSIA R would like for us to believe that they too are fabrications like (as she claims) “The book of narrations” of Bukhari.

Finally, even if we were to grant that everything that OSIA R claims is true….and that Islam in its original form is a benign and peaceful religion, how does one explain the trail of continuous bloodshed it has left across the world in its 1400 years of existence? And how is it that even in this day and age we have such medieval entities like the IS, Al Qaida, Boko Haram, Taliban, Al Nusrah Front, and hundreds of violently militant Wahabi and DeoBandi groups that continue this tradition of murder in the name of the Prophet and his teachings?

Today’s attack in Paris that killed 12 (and counting) innocent people is just another sample of their doings. Is their any other faith in the World today that behaves this way? OSIA R is strongly advised to drop her blinkers and re-evaluate her faith instead of expecting the rest of us to drink her Kool aid.

Like
Reply
Osia R says:
January 8, 2015 at 11:49 pm

2

6

Rate This

Peace be upon you, Matiya

You know, im willing to dump my koolaid out- in a minute, but before i do, please clarify one point. A PART of your piece quotes, “Islam in its original form is a benign and peaceful religion”.
For all i understand, you agree with me. You admitted that Islam is religion of peace. Therefore, seems as if we’ve both got our blinkers on!

Because you sound like a reasonable person of intellect. Tell me, isn’t it at all possible that anyone can take a piece or phrase, from every single piece written in the history of mankind, and completely obliterate out the rest of whatever was spoken or said, and deduce what ever they wish to, when they refuse to take into account, the context of why, or where, or how, or what was stated previously, or after, or in what regards? Like i did; from your post. Just as you did; from the Quran.

I’m assuming if you’re so well read, you most definitely must have read the Bible too. But incase you haven’t. And if you haven’t, i’m sure my biased interpretation wouldn’t suffice as worthy, so let’s take an outsider’s view on it.
Source: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124494788

“Philip Jenkins is a professor at Penn State University and author of two books dealing with the issue: the recently published Jesus Wars, and Dark Passages , which has not been published but is already drawing controversy.

“Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible.”
– Philip Jenkins, author of ‘Jesus Wars’

Violence in the Quran, he and others say, is largely a defense against attack.

“By the standards of the time, which is the 7th century A.D., the laws of war that are laid down by the Quran are actually reasonably humane,” he says. “Then we turn to the Bible, and we actually find something that is for many people a real surprise. There is a specific kind of warfare laid down in the Bible which we can only call genocide.”

Now does this mean that the widely acclaimed, beloved to many, just recently celebrated in all retail stores and lumberjacks across the woodlands, and in churches, and most commercials, basically almost a whole chunk of the world- whom part of the world has been living in memory of all along, has actually been some “henious man” all this while??
No. And i am sure all my fellow Christians stand behind me on this one.
Context, my friend. Context of speech is everything. Not so much the words.
Especially when the literature is in form of poetry, in a language much more complicated than english. Since english is the simplest of languages.

This ongoing bloodshed you speak of since 1400 yrs, carried out by “muslims” isn’t religous bloodshed. It’s political. And that’s a longer ramble. And if you’d like to continue. It would be my pleasure. I’ll wait for your reply though. This post is already lengthy enough for now…But along those lines that you mentioned in light of recent events. Do you happen to know that there were two Muslims among the 12 killed in France?
Also, please do answer this one: If Islam, and muslims are the source of all terror, then why is it that one of the greatest allies to the West happens to be a dictator-ship, non-democratic, openly women denouncing, OPENLY FUNDING, the backbone of ISIS- the FREE SYRIAN REBELS who are PART OF AL-QAEDA, whom btw, the WEST was so stupidly and openly supporting AS WELL, but calling them the FSA (Free Syrian Rebels) instead on national TV, to help free the Syrains from the dictatorship of Assad’s rule, while it contiues to keep in tact all alliances, and happy dandy relations with Saudia Arabia… and countries alike; like the UAE, Jordan, Qatar, Kuwait, BAHRAIN?? Why has the media NEVER portrayed the continued risings against the regime in Bahrain, and only concentrated on all countries that are a threat to Israel’s safety only, because of their alliaces to Iran? Only Iran and it’s allies are dictatorships. Not the salafist, deobandi, Wahabi regimes? Why?? Why the double standards?? Please answer that. Then i’ll answer your question as to why the “muslims” are always the ones involved in terror attacks.

You seem to follow the News really well. Let’s hear your reply.
Good day!

Like
Reply
abaworlock says:
January 11, 2015 at 5:58 am

9

3

Rate This

You will not get straight or truthful answer from a muslems. You need to understand Islamic deception. It is part of the religion. The word “islam” “muslim”means submission or surrender Research these words! Takiyya. Tawriya. Kitman. Muruna. 1. Takiyya This means that Muslims are allowed to lie, and conceal their true thoughts, feelings, or character. It is based on the verse in the Quran which states: “Let believers not make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful – he that does has nothing to hope for from Allah – except in self-defense.” (Surah 3:28) Because Muslims feel as though their actions against us are in “self-defense,” this provides justification for their lying. Osama Bin Laden claimed that the attacks on Sept 11 were justified because it was “self defense.” Islamic Sharia Law also validates lying for a higher aim: “When it is possible to achieve an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible, and lying is obligatory if the goal is obligatory.” (Reliance of the Traveler, Para r8.2 ) 2. Tawriya This term means that it is ok to lie in virtually all circumstances. Tawirya is when a Muslim says one thing, but basically means another. You could think of it as creative lying. As long as his words technically support the alternate meaning, it is ok to lie. For example: you could as a Muslim if they know where Abdullah is. They could respond “no” to you, as long as they keep in mind a totally different Abdullah than who you are asking about. 3. Kitman This term is when Muslims only tell you part of the truth. Perhaps the biggest lie Muslims try to push is in relation to the term “jihad.” I cannot tell you how many times I’ve heard Muslims try to claim that the term refers to an “internal” or “spiritual struggle” and has nothing to do with terrorism. This is a complete crock of… well you know. 4. Muruna This term means that Muslims can use flexibility to blend in with their enemy and surroundings. As long as they can justify their behavior as deceiving the infidel in order to attain a higher goal, then it is perfectly ok. So Muslims can shave their beards, wear western clothing, or drink alcohol in order to blend in. If they can convince you they are a part of your society, they are pretty much off the hook for obeying the verses of the Quran which forbids this type of behavior. A common way of using muruna is for Muslims to take non-Muslims as their spouses so their true agenda does not come under scrutiny. A perfect example of muruna in practice is Hilary Clinton’s aide Huma Abedin marrying Jewish Congressman Anthony Weiner. This arrangement provided Huma unprecedented access to the White House, and throughout it all, her true intentions were never questioned.

Like
bodhitreeaum says:
February 27, 2015 at 7:48 pm

3

0

Rate This

Muhammed called the Torah and new testament holy scriptures so why as a “Muslim” do you knock it?? Thing is in non Islamic cultures people could seek truth wherever it may lie, hence incredible advancements in science. In Islam only the cup presented to them was allowed as truth and should one look outside the small cup to the ocean of truth they would be killed.

Like
Osia R says:
December 23, 2014 at 6:03 am

4

8

Rate This

“And do not dispute with the followers of the Scripture, (Jews and Christians), unless it be in a way that is best with good words and best of manner, except for those of them who commit injustice and wrong and to them say, We believe in that which has been sent down to us and that which has been sent down to you. And our God and your God is One, and it is to Him whom we submit to in Islam.” (29:46)

“Every Individual is either your brother in faith, or your brother in Humanity” Ali-ibn Abi Talib
Ali ibn Abi Talib was the man who was a reflection of the teachings of Mohammad bin Abdullah. Not the caliphs, not the conquerors, not the war mongerers.
The people who are recognized as the followers (Shiites) of Ali ibn Abi Talib, are known as the infidels, kafirs, “Jews” etc. by the Terrorists or these (ANYTHING BUT) “ISLAMIC Extremists”.
You call your website the Muslim Issue, but you have completely obliterated a whole (MAJORITY) of the Muslim people that condemn each and every act that has cost innocent lives. Number one condition for jihad: GIVE THE ENEMY PRIOR NOTICE WITH SUFFICIENT TIME TO PREPARE A PROPER DEFENSE FOR ITSELF, and NEVER ATTACK WOMEN AND CHILDREN.
Please check:The achitname of Mohammad. http://www.bedawi.com/St_Katherine_EN.html

Like
Reply
Pigasus (pioneering porcine flight) says:
December 23, 2014 at 7:36 am

9

1

Rate This

… you have completely obliterated a whole (MAJORITY) of the Muslim people that condemn each and every act that has cost innocent lives.

So the concern is for believers, just believers? The people murdered and tormented don’t matter?

Don’t you get it? We, the civilized people upon this planet, stand in jeopardy from a community of homicidal lunatics you are excusing.

If I misunderstand something, kindly explain what. Because I am disinclined to excuse any of it.

Like
Reply
Osia R says:
December 24, 2014 at 5:07 pm

6

8

Rate This

Even before i begin, i want to apologize beforehand about this long ramble…lol

“So the concern is for believers, just believers? The people murdered and tormented don’t matter?”

I’m sorry if i wasn’t thorough. Every individual matters; whether they’re a believer or not.
We do not reside in the hearts of one another. Therefore, no one can claim whether the other person is a believer or not. For all we know, anyone can claim to be a believer, and not be at heart. Therefore, claiming or disclaiming doesn’t really suffice as anything. We are not the judge. Here we have “believers” conducting inhumane atrocities, as we all are witnessing now, and have been since the beginning of time- ({Cain and Abel} – A reference applicable to believers only, i know. but i’m just making a point). Just claiming to be a believer and acting in complete opposition to the scriptures makes you worse than a disbeleiver. Because at the end of the day, Cain was aslo a believer….and he’s going to hell (only solace for all true believers) And technically, so was/is Satan….
Therefore, a believer doesn’t mean they’re the only ones included within the clause of humanity. No. It’s only a term that encompasses a generalised sense of unity amongst a majority of the individuals inhabiting this planet. Concluding from the fact, majority of the people persay are followers of the Abrahamic faith (Christianity/Judiasm/Islam). Majority. Not all. That is why I included the famous quote from Ali ibn Abi Talib, “Every individual is either your brother in faith, or your BROTHER IN HUMANITY”. Humanity Is Not limited to the “Believers” only.

To understand the viciousness of these people (Terrorists, Extremists, “Muslim” militants, “Jihadists” etc.) It’s crucial to analyze the history of Islam. In summary, when the Islamic empire was flourishing and booming. As we all have heard, being SPREAD BY THE SWORD, those atrociously fierce conquerors were the same rulers that INVENTED their own philosophies to JUSTIFY KILLING people and conquering their lands. Guess what was the best way to lure the people and form a huge army to do so? Yup. The same method as we are witnessing today again. Call it a religious duty. “Kill all the disbelievers and spread “righteousness” and you will go to heaven.” Ignorant idiots followed thru then, ignorant idiots are still following thru today.
You see, the fundamentals which ISIS and all these other groups are built on follow the same principles as those caliphs, that took over the islamic empire, soon after the demise of Mohammad ibn Abdullah. The right to leadership was never meant for the power hungry, who enforced their rule over the people through fear and forcing conversions.Which was exactly what the leaders of the Ummayad Dynasty and Abbasid Dynasty did. The right to leadership was soley for Ali ibn Abi Talib, the heir to the Prophet’s teachings. None of the TRUE descendants of Mohammad were given the chance to lead the people. They were all killed off by both dynasties. Only Ali ibn Abi Talib had a brief chance. Which was enough time to make a firm distinction between his way ( the Islamic way of ruling) vs. the Caliphs’ way of ruling viciously. Proof lies in the fact that each and every one of the Mohammad’s decendants were killed off. Ali ibn Abi Talib- killed, his son Hasan- killed, his other son Hussain- killed brutally in Iraq slaughtered-beheaded along with his family and companions, Hussain’s son, Ali ibn Hussain – killed and so on and on… Now you’re probably thinking I’m only rambling because i don’t agree over who had the throne. Although, when you analyze Islamic History, it seems nothing more different than a game of thrones; however, there was more to it. Because, the actual leaders who had the legitimate right to rule, never pursued it because they weren’t greedy for power. Proof lies when you read the the book of Ali ibn Abi Talib. http://www.nahjulbalagha.org/
The book of narrations, Bukhari, which everyone quotes from, was fabricated by The Ummayd dynasty, it’s the book where Mohammad is portryaed as a pedophile and contains fabricated words that were used to legitimaize the ruling parties’ false claims as heirs of the Islamic empire, etc. Also, if you believe i’m just stating a mere opinion, it’s understandable, but do give a read to the link i sent above, and then formulate your own opinion.

Like
That guy says:
December 19, 2014 at 10:48 pm

1

9

Rate This

go suck a donkey penis, fuckers

Like
Reply
Pigasus (pioneering porcine flight) says:
December 20, 2014 at 1:32 am

4

2

Rate This

Another happy contributor. So, you bestow sexual favors upon livestock? Country bred, are we not? And you prefer the donkeys?

Why, each to his own. And, if human females don’t do it for you, there’s always the Petting Zoo! Remember, if it burns when you pee, see your doctor!

Like
Reply
Heathen says:
December 20, 2014 at 3:35 am

2

0

Rate This

Is that a recommendation – and oes the koran actually allow that? You learn something new every day.

Like
Reply
Pigasus (pioneering porcine flight) says:
December 20, 2014 at 2:28 pm

4

3

Rate This

Did Muhammad drink the camel urine before he fellatiated the donkeys or after? We’ll have to check the scripture. It’s gotta be somewhere in Bukhari.

Liked by 1 person
Poliniko says:
December 13, 2014 at 9:46 am

You are following this blog

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s